Up armoured Shermans

Discussion around the Second World War.
Seret
Posts: 220
Joined: 15 Feb 2016, 15:45
Contact:

Re: Up armoured Shermans

Post by Seret » 22 Jun 2018, 17:08

Rumblestrip wrote:
22 Jun 2018, 11:59
Anyone out there with a chemistry/physics degree majoring in metal characteristics?
Well, I have a mechanical engineering degree specialising in the failure of stressed materials, and a background in weapons and explosives, which will probably do you.

Extra stuff stuck to the outside of you tank in an ad-hoc way will have a non-zero effect, but closer to the "zero" end than the "non" end. Wood and sandbags would be particularly useless, especially against kinetic rounds.

For shaped charges/HEAT you want some kind of spaced or slotted armour that messes with the standoff distance. So the Soviet "bedspring armour" was probably quite good, spare track links not so much. But if you're going to be carrying them anyway it certainly wouldn't hurt to put them on the glacis.

User avatar
Rumblestrip
Posts: 60
Joined: 25 Jan 2013, 14:25
Location: ...where the oatcakes live...

Re: Up armoured Shermans

Post by Rumblestrip » 22 Jun 2018, 20:41

Seret wrote:
22 Jun 2018, 17:08
Rumblestrip wrote:
22 Jun 2018, 11:59
Anyone out there with a chemistry/physics degree majoring in metal characteristics?
Well, I have a mechanical engineering degree specialising in the failure of stressed materials, and a background in weapons and explosives, which will probably do you.
Yeah, that's what I meant😊

Thanks.

Andrew
¡Vencerán…pero no convencerán!

David Reasoner
Posts: 67
Joined: 16 Mar 2012, 07:18

Re: Up armoured Shermans

Post by David Reasoner » 23 Jun 2018, 00:48

Gary wrote:
22 Jun 2018, 07:11
This up-armour thread reminds me of the British tank commander who was dismayed to find a manufacturers plate on his tank stating ' training purposes only- mild steel'. This meant that he had landed at Normandy, crossed France and Belgium in an in an unarmoured vehicle.........

(From memory a Cromwell I believe...)
I recall a similar tale (but can't remember where I read it...) of a "non-ballistic" (i.e. mild steel) M48 training tank somehow getting mixed in with a batch of normal tanks and ending up in combat in Vietnam.

David

Gary
Posts: 53
Joined: 16 Mar 2012, 07:14
Location: Costa Almeria, Spain

Re: Up armoured Shermans

Post by Gary » 23 Jun 2018, 11:04

There was a discussion ( somewhere! I can't find it now!) about the effectiveness of Sherman Jumble with added armour plate and interesting photos of range tests against various AT guns etc.......
"The man who has no sense of history, is like a man who has no ears or eyes"

"Good health is merely the slowest possible rate at which one can die."

User avatar
Rumblestrip
Posts: 60
Joined: 25 Jan 2013, 14:25
Location: ...where the oatcakes live...

Re: Up armoured Shermans

Post by Rumblestrip » 23 Jun 2018, 13:08

Gary wrote:
23 Jun 2018, 11:04
There was a discussion...about the effectiveness of Sherman Jumble...
That was the one with the old mattress, rocking horse and chamber pot strapped to the front with second hand kids' clothes wasn't it?

I'm pretty sure Patton had a view on it...

Cheers
Andrew
PS love autocorrect 😊
¡Vencerán…pero no convencerán!

granty101
Posts: 479
Joined: 26 Mar 2015, 18:18
Location: Durham

Re: Up armoured Shermans

Post by granty101 » 23 Jun 2018, 15:57

Gary wrote:
23 Jun 2018, 11:04
There was a discussion about the effectiveness of Sherman Jumble
I think Gary meant the Sherman Auto Jumble, where you could pick up spare track links, odd bogie wheels, etc, to 'personalise' the look of your "pristine, straight out of the showroom" Sherman Tank.

Grant
Vot is your Name? Don't tell him Pike!!!

Phil_Gray_260
Posts: 56
Joined: 30 Dec 2014, 12:30

Re: Up armoured Shermans (heat rounds)

Post by Phil_Gray_260 » 24 Jun 2018, 08:07

Something picked up from youtube.... so large pinch of salt.. but...

WW2 HEAT rounds relied on conventional fusing to detonate on contact. This was a problem as the speed at which the round deformed on contact meant that by the time the fuse had triggered the shaped charge warhead the shaped element of the charge had deformed so as to negate the Monroe effect it wwas supposed to produce?

Post war adoption of piezo electric fuses allowed the sped of detonation to exceed the speed of physical deformation.

Gary
Posts: 53
Joined: 16 Mar 2012, 07:14
Location: Costa Almeria, Spain

Re: Up armoured Shermans

Post by Gary » 24 Jun 2018, 10:32

Don't you just love auto correct......anyhoo.....found the other discussion now...

https://www.thewargameswebsite.com/foru ... -shermans/
"The man who has no sense of history, is like a man who has no ears or eyes"

"Good health is merely the slowest possible rate at which one can die."

Seret
Posts: 220
Joined: 15 Feb 2016, 15:45
Contact:

Re: Up armoured Shermans (heat rounds)

Post by Seret » 25 Jun 2018, 10:55

Phil_Gray_260 wrote:
24 Jun 2018, 08:07
Something picked up from youtube.... so large pinch of salt.. but...

WW2 HEAT rounds relied on conventional fusing to detonate on contact. This was a problem as the speed at which the round deformed on contact meant that by the time the fuse had triggered the shaped charge warhead the shaped element of the charge had deformed so as to negate the Monroe effect it wwas supposed to produce?

Post war adoption of piezo electric fuses allowed the sped of detonation to exceed the speed of physical deformation.
They certainly had trouble with fuzing. I know the early PIATs were pretty dodgy, and I think the early bazookas, too.

Post Reply